Global
Czech Republic
7.4
 GW
44
 MT

Coal plants in

Czech Republic

Additional profit over 30 years
123.1
Bn. $
% Profitable
100
%
 
Annual CO2 emissions saved
44
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
21.8
Bn. $

Investment Potential

45
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.

Investment breakdown

21.8
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
123.1
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
5,565
M. $
Wind
15,385
M. $
Battery
882
M. $

Production costs

13.5
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
4.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy

Dive deeper into the data

0
 Regions
0
 Power plants
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Ústí nad Labem
CO2 emissions saved
19.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
9.0
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pardubický
CO2 emissions saved
7.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Central Bohemian
CO2 emissions saved
5.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Moravskoslezsky
CO2 emissions saved
5.1
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.0
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Karlovarský
CO2 emissions saved
1.9
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.9
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Plzensky
CO2 emissions saved
1.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Jihomoravský
CO2 emissions saved
0.7
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Královéhradecký
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Olomoucky
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Praha
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.4
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Ustecky
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Moravian-Silesian
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Pocerady power station
CO2 emissions
6.0
  MT/y
Investment need
2.8
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Chvaletice power station
CO2 emissions
5.2
  MT/y
Investment need
2.6
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tusimice power station
CO2 emissions
4.8
  MT/y
Investment need
2.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Prunerov power station
CO2 emissions
3.9
  MT/y
Investment need
1.8
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Detmarovice power station
CO2 emissions
3.6
  MT/y
Investment need
2.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ledvice power station
CO2 emissions
3.4
  MT/y
Investment need
1.6
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Opatovice power station
CO2 emissions
2.4
  MT/y
Investment need
1.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kladno power station
CO2 emissions
2.3
  MT/y
Investment need
1.4
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Melnik power station
CO2 emissions
2.3
  MT/y
Investment need
1.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tisova power station
CO2 emissions
1.9
  MT/y
Investment need
0.9
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Komorany power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.6
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Trebovice power station
CO2 emissions
1.0
  MT/y
Investment need
0.6
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Plzen CHP power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
  MT/y
Investment need
0.4
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hodonin power station
CO2 emissions
0.7
  MT/y
Investment need
0.3
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Malesice power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
  MT/y
Investment need
0.4
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mondi Steti power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
  MT/y
Investment need
0.3
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Porici power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
  MT/y
Investment need
0.3
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Plzenska energetika ELU III power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sko-Energo power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Karvina power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Olomouc power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Prerov power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pribram power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Trinec-E3 power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zlin power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Barisal
Barahona
Bangkok
Banten
Bangka-Belitung
Balochistan
Bagny
Bali
Baden-Wuerttemberg
Bac Giang
Azua
Aydin
Atacama Region
Asturias
Arkansas
Arkhangelsk
Assam
Apulia
Arizona
Arad
Andhra Pradesh
Antofagasta Region
Ankara
Amur
Andalusia
Altai Krai
Anhui
Almaty
Akmola
Alberta
Adana
Alabama
Aceh
Alaska
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
Make the move.
Resources
Privacy Policy
Imprint
Switch Tool
Contact