Home
SwitchTool
About us
Insights
Resources
Global
Poland
29.2
GW
158
MT
Coal plants in
Poland
Additional profit over 30 years
490.6
Bn. $
% Profitable
100
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
158
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
87.4
Bn. $
Investment Potential
49
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.
Investment breakdown
87.4
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
490.6
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
19,507
M. $
Wind
64,359
M. $
Battery
3,527
M. $
Production costs
13.5
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
4.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy
Dive deeper into the data
0
Regions
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions saved (high-low)
CO2 emissions saved (low-high)
Total W-S-B inv. need (high-low)
Total W-S-B inv. need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Śląskie
CO2 emissions saved
32.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
20.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Mazowieckie
CO2 emissions saved
30.9
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lodzkie
CO2 emissions saved
30.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Opolskie
CO2 emissions saved
14.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
8.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Dolnośląskie
CO2 emissions saved
13.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
6.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Świętokrzyskie
CO2 emissions saved
9.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wielkopolskie
CO2 emissions saved
7.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
West Pomerania
CO2 emissions saved
5.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Małopolskie
CO2 emissions saved
5.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
1.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
1.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lubuskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Zachodnio-Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Podlaskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lubelskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tarnow
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Belchatow power station
CO2 emissions
28.4
MT/y
Investment need
13.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kozienice power station
CO2 emissions
20.2
MT/y
Investment need
11.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Opole power station
CO2 emissions
14.8
MT/y
Investment need
8.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jaworzno power station
CO2 emissions
12.4
MT/y
Investment need
7.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Turów power station
CO2 emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Polaniec power station
CO2 emissions
9.6
MT/y
Investment need
5.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rybnik power station
CO2 emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Patnow power station
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Dolna Odra power station
CO2 emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Laziska power station
CO2 emissions
5.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ostroleka power station
CO2 emissions
4.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siekierki power station
CO2 emissions
3.5
MT/y
Investment need
2.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zeran power station
CO2 emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lagisza power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Krakow-Leg power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siersza power station
CO2 emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Skawina power station
CO2 emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Poznan Karolin power station
CO2 emissions
1.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wroclaw power station
CO2 emissions
1.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Chorzow Elcho power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gdansk-2 power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lodz-4 power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bydgoszcz power station
CO2 emissions
1.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lodz-3 power station
CO2 emissions
1.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Katowice PKE power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pomorzany power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siechnice power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Swiecie Pulp Mill power station
CO2 emissions
0.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bialystok power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gdansk-3 power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Miechowice power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pulawy ZAP Works power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
ZW Nowa power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bedzin power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bielsko-Biala power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pulawy power station (Grupa Azoty)
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Szczecin power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zabrze power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Czestochowa CHP power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tychy power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gliwice Works power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gorzow power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zofiowka Moszczenica power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zonguldak
Zhejiang
Zhambyl
Yunlin
Zachodnio-Pomorskie
Zabaykalsky Krai
Yunnan
Yilan
Yalova
Xinjiang
Wyoming
Wisconsin
Wielkopolskie
Western Visayas
Western Australia
Western Macedonia
West Virginia
West Sumatra
West Nusa Tenggara
West Pomerania
West Java
West Kalimantan
West Bengal
Washington
Waikato
Vidin
Victoria
Virginia
Veneto
Valparaíso Region
Vâlcea
Uusimaa
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Ustecky
Ústí nad Labem
Utah
Ulaanbaatar
Ulsan
Tula
Trenčín
Tra Vinh
Tomsk
Toamasina
Tohoku
Tianjin
Thanh Hoa
Thai Nguyen
Thai Binh
Tennessee
Texas
Telangana
Tashkent
Tarnow
Taoyuan
Taipei
Tamil Nadu
Tainan
Taichung
Syddanmark
Świętokrzyskie
Suchitepequez
Sverdlovsk
Stara Zagora
Southern District
South Chungcheong
Southeast Sulawesi
Southern
South Sumatra
South Kalimantan
South Sulawesi
South Pyongan
South Jeolla
South Holland
South Dakota
South Gyeongsang
South Carolina
Souss-Massa
Soc Trang
Soccsksarden
Smolyan
Sliven
Şırnak
Śląskie
Sivas
Sindh
Sihanoukville
Shandong
Shikoku
Sichuan
Shanghai
Shanxi
Shan
Shaanxi
Selangor
Schleswig-Holstein
Savinja
Saxony
Saxony-Anhalt
Savanne
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
