Home
SwitchTool
About us
Insights
Resources
Global
Poland
29.2
GW
158
MT
Coal plants in
Poland
Additional profit over 30 years
490.6
Bn. $
% Profitable
100
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
158
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
87.4
Bn. $
Investment Potential
49
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.
Investment breakdown
87.4
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
490.6
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
19,507
M. $
Wind
64,359
M. $
Battery
3,527
M. $
Production costs
13.5
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
4.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy
Dive deeper into the data
0
Regions
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions saved (high-low)
CO2 emissions saved (low-high)
Total W-S-B inv. need (high-low)
Total W-S-B inv. need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Śląskie
CO2 emissions saved
32.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
20.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Mazowieckie
CO2 emissions saved
30.9
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lodzkie
CO2 emissions saved
30.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Opolskie
CO2 emissions saved
14.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
8.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Dolnośląskie
CO2 emissions saved
13.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
6.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Świętokrzyskie
CO2 emissions saved
9.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wielkopolskie
CO2 emissions saved
7.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
West Pomerania
CO2 emissions saved
5.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Małopolskie
CO2 emissions saved
5.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
1.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
1.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lubuskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Zachodnio-Pomorskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Podlaskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lubelskie
CO2 emissions saved
0.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tarnow
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Belchatow power station
CO2 emissions
28.4
MT/y
Investment need
13.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kozienice power station
CO2 emissions
20.2
MT/y
Investment need
11.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Opole power station
CO2 emissions
14.8
MT/y
Investment need
8.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jaworzno power station
CO2 emissions
12.4
MT/y
Investment need
7.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Turów power station
CO2 emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Polaniec power station
CO2 emissions
9.6
MT/y
Investment need
5.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rybnik power station
CO2 emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Patnow power station
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Dolna Odra power station
CO2 emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Laziska power station
CO2 emissions
5.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ostroleka power station
CO2 emissions
4.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siekierki power station
CO2 emissions
3.5
MT/y
Investment need
2.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zeran power station
CO2 emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lagisza power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Krakow-Leg power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siersza power station
CO2 emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Skawina power station
CO2 emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Poznan Karolin power station
CO2 emissions
1.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wroclaw power station
CO2 emissions
1.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Chorzow Elcho power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gdansk-2 power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lodz-4 power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bydgoszcz power station
CO2 emissions
1.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lodz-3 power station
CO2 emissions
1.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Katowice PKE power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pomorzany power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Siechnice power station
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Swiecie Pulp Mill power station
CO2 emissions
0.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bialystok power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gdansk-3 power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Miechowice power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pulawy ZAP Works power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
ZW Nowa power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bedzin power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bielsko-Biala power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pulawy power station (Grupa Azoty)
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Szczecin power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zabrze power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Czestochowa CHP power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tychy power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gliwice Works power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gorzow power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zofiowka Moszczenica power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Saskatchewan
Satakunta
Sardegna
Sarawak
Saraburi
Santa Cruz
Sakhalin
San Cristóbal
Sakha
Santa Catarina
Sainyabuli
Republika Srpska
Ruse
Ryazan
Saarland
Rostov
Rome
Rio Grande do Sul
Riau
Réunion
Retalhuleu
Queensland
Rangpur
Rajasthan
Rayong
Quang Nam
Quang Ninh
Quang Binh
Qinghai
Punjab state
Pyongyang
Punjab province
Puerto Rico
Primorsky
Praha
Prachinburi
Pomorskie
Pomoravlje
Podlaskie
Plzensky
Pljevlja
Pernik
Perak
Pennsylvania
Peloponnísou
Pavlodar
Pardubický
Paraná
Papua
Paijat-Hame
Pamplemousses
Ostrobothnia
Oriental
Orhon
Orenburg
Omsk
Opolskie
Oklahoma
Olomoucky
Ohio
Ogun
Odisha
Oddar Meanchey
Novosibirsk
Novaci
Nova Scotia
Northern Mindanao
Northern Ireland
Northern Hungary
North Western
North Sumatra
North Sulawesi
North Rhine-Westphalia
North Pyongan
North Kazakhstan
North Maluku
North Jeolla
North Hamgyong
North Gyeongsang
North Dakota
Nordjylland
Norte de Santander
North Carolina
Ningxia
Noord-Brabant
New South Wales
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New Brunswick
New Caledonia
Nevada
Negeri Sembilan
Nebraska
Murmansk
Munster
Muğla
Mpumalanga
Moselle
Moravian-Silesian
Moravskoslezsky
Previous
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more