Home
SwitchTool
About us
Insights
Resources
Global
Vietnam
30.7
GW
131
MT
Coal plants in
Vietnam
Additional profit over 30 years
49.7
Bn. $
% Profitable
96
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
131
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
70.6
Bn. $
Investment Potential
41
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.
Investment breakdown
70.6
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
49.7
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
44,964
M. $
Wind
23,014
M. $
Battery
2,900
M. $
Production costs
5.2
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
4.1
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy
Dive deeper into the data
0
Regions
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions saved (high-low)
CO2 emissions saved (low-high)
Total W-S-B inv. need (high-low)
Total W-S-B inv. need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Quang Ninh
CO2 emissions saved
27.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tra Vinh
CO2 emissions saved
17.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
9.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Binh Thuan
CO2 emissions saved
17.1
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
8.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Ha Tinh
CO2 emissions saved
11.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
6.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Hai Duong
CO2 emissions saved
11.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Thanh Hoa
CO2 emissions saved
8.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Thai Binh
CO2 emissions saved
7.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Hai Phong
CO2 emissions saved
5.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Hau Giang
CO2 emissions saved
5.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Khanh Hoa
CO2 emissions saved
5.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.7
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Quang Binh
CO2 emissions saved
4.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Soc Trang
CO2 emissions saved
4.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Dong Nai
CO2 emissions saved
2.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Bac Giang
CO2 emissions saved
1.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Thai Nguyen
CO2 emissions saved
1.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lam Dong
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Quang Nam
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Lang Son
CO2 emissions saved
0.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Duyen Hai Power Generation Complex
CO2 emissions
17.3
MT/y
Investment need
9.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Vinh Tan power station
CO2 emissions
17.1
MT/y
Investment need
8.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mong Duong power station
CO2 emissions
9.8
MT/y
Investment need
5.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Vung Ang power station
CO2 emissions
9.6
MT/y
Investment need
5.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nghi Son power station
CO2 emissions
8.0
MT/y
Investment need
5.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Thai Binh Power Center
CO2 emissions
7.6
MT/y
Investment need
4.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pha Lai Power Complex
CO2 emissions
6.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Quang Ninh power station
CO2 emissions
5.9
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hai Phong Thermal Power Station
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Van Phong power station
CO2 emissions
5.2
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hai Duong Thermal Power Plant
CO2 emissions
5.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Song Hau Thermal Power Plant
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Quang Trach Power Center
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Long Phu Power Centre
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Uong Bi power station
CO2 emissions
3.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cam Pha power station
CO2 emissions
3.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Thang Long power station
CO2 emissions
2.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nhon Trach Formosa power station
CO2 emissions
2.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mao Khe power station
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ha Tinh Formosa Plastics Steel Complex power station
CO2 emissions
2.1
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Son Dong power station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
An Khanh power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cao Ngan power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hau Giang Lee & Man power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Na Duong power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Vedan Vietnam Cogeneration power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nong Son power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Than Bauxit power station
CO2 emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zonguldak
Zhejiang
Zhambyl
Yunlin
Zachodnio-Pomorskie
Zabaykalsky Krai
Yunnan
Yilan
Yalova
Xinjiang
Wyoming
Wisconsin
Wielkopolskie
Western Visayas
Western Australia
Western Macedonia
West Virginia
West Sumatra
West Nusa Tenggara
West Pomerania
West Java
West Kalimantan
West Bengal
Washington
Waikato
Vidin
Victoria
Virginia
Veneto
Valparaíso Region
Vâlcea
Uusimaa
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Ustecky
Ústí nad Labem
Utah
Ulaanbaatar
Ulsan
Tula
Trenčín
Tra Vinh
Tomsk
Toamasina
Tohoku
Tianjin
Thanh Hoa
Thai Nguyen
Thai Binh
Tennessee
Texas
Telangana
Tashkent
Tarnow
Taoyuan
Taipei
Tamil Nadu
Tainan
Taichung
Syddanmark
Świętokrzyskie
Suchitepequez
Sverdlovsk
Stara Zagora
Southern District
South Chungcheong
Southeast Sulawesi
Southern
South Sumatra
South Kalimantan
South Sulawesi
South Pyongan
South Jeolla
South Holland
South Dakota
South Gyeongsang
South Carolina
Souss-Massa
Soc Trang
Soccsksarden
Smolyan
Sliven
Şırnak
Śląskie
Sivas
Sindh
Sihanoukville
Shandong
Shikoku
Sichuan
Shanghai
Shanxi
Shan
Shaanxi
Selangor
Schleswig-Holstein
Savinja
Saxony
Saxony-Anhalt
Savanne
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more