Home
SwitchTool
About us
Insights
Resources
Global
United States
198.3
GW
1005
MT
Coal plants in
United States
Additional profit over 30 years
553.7
Bn. $
% Profitable
94
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
1005
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
475.1
Bn. $
Investment Potential
21
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.
Investment breakdown
475.1
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
553.7
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
215,439
M. $
Wind
265,154
M. $
Battery
23,722
M. $
Production costs
5.2
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
3.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy
Dive deeper into the data
0
Regions
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions saved (high-low)
CO2 emissions saved (low-high)
Total W-S-B inv. need (high-low)
Total W-S-B inv. need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Indiana
CO2 emissions saved
78.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
37.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
West Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
63.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
34.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kentucky
CO2 emissions saved
57.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
29.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pennsylvania
CO2 emissions saved
52.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
26.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Missouri
CO2 emissions saved
51.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
47.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
23.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Texas
CO2 emissions saved
42.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Ohio
CO2 emissions saved
42.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Illinois
CO2 emissions saved
36.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wyoming
CO2 emissions saved
35.1
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
13.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Michigan
CO2 emissions saved
34.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
18.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tennessee
CO2 emissions saved
34.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Florida
CO2 emissions saved
32.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
16.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Georgia
CO2 emissions saved
30.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wisconsin
CO2 emissions saved
27.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
27.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arkansas
CO2 emissions saved
27.1
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
11.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Iowa
CO2 emissions saved
26.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kansas
CO2 emissions saved
25.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alabama
CO2 emissions saved
25.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Utah
CO2 emissions saved
24.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Colorado
CO2 emissions saved
24.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Minnesota
CO2 emissions saved
22.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
9.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Nebraska
CO2 emissions saved
20.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Oklahoma
CO2 emissions saved
18.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Louisiana
CO2 emissions saved
15.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arizona
CO2 emissions saved
12.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
75
%
Maryland
CO2 emissions saved
10.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
9.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
33
%
Montana
CO2 emissions saved
8.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
8.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
67
%
New Mexico
CO2 emissions saved
8.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Mississippi
CO2 emissions saved
5.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Nevada
CO2 emissions saved
4.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Washington
CO2 emissions saved
3.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
New Hampshire
CO2 emissions saved
3.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.7
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Puerto Rico
CO2 emissions saved
3.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Delaware
CO2 emissions saved
2.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
2.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alaska
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Gaston Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Schahfer Generating Station
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Stanton Energy Center
CO2 emissions
4.5
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Weston Power Plant
CO2 emissions
4.5
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Clover power station
CO2 emissions
4.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Milton R. Young Station
CO2 emissions
4.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Louisa Generating Station
CO2 emissions
4.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sandy Creek Plant
CO2 emissions
4.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wateree Station
CO2 emissions
4.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pirkey Power Plant
CO2 emissions
3.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Leland Olds Station
CO2 emissions
3.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Centralia Power Plant
CO2 emissions
3.7
MT/y
Investment need
2.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mayo Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
3.7
MT/y
Investment need
1.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ottumwa Generating Station
CO2 emissions
3.7
MT/y
Investment need
1.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
George Neal Station South
CO2 emissions
3.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Longview Plant
CO2 emissions
3.5
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
East Bend Generating Station
CO2 emissions
3.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Green Station
CO2 emissions
3.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Northside Generating Station
CO2 emissions
3.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
North Valmy Station
CO2 emissions
3.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
A. B. Brown power station
CO2 emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Newton power station
CO2 emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Plum Point Energy Station
CO2 emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Coleto Creek power station
CO2 emissions
3.1
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Roy S. Nelson Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
3.1
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Williams Station
CO2 emissions
3.1
MT/y
Investment need
1.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
AES Puerto Rico power station
CO2 emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
George Neal Station North
CO2 emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Grand River Energy Center
CO2 emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Karn Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center
CO2 emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Allen S. King Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
2.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Edwardsport power station
CO2 emissions
2.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Flint Creek Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lawrence Energy Center
CO2 emissions
2.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Muskogee Generating Station
CO2 emissions
2.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hawthorn Station
CO2 emissions
2.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pawnee Station
CO2 emissions
2.8
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Michigan City Generating Station
CO2 emissions
2.7
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Red Hills Generation Facility
CO2 emissions
2.7
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
G.G. Allen Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hayden Station
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
John W. Turk Jr. Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
John Twitty Energy Center
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Merrimack Station
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Naughton Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Seward Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wilson Station
CO2 emissions
2.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bonanza power station
CO2 emissions
2.5
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hugo power station
CO2 emissions
2.5
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cholla Generating Station
CO2 emissions
2.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Coyote Station
CO2 emissions
2.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Indian River power station
CO2 emissions
2.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
San Miguel Electric Cooperative
CO2 emissions
2.4
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Big Stone Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
E.W. Brown Generating Station
CO2 emissions
2.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Edgewater Generating Station
CO2 emissions
2.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Northeastern Station
CO2 emissions
2.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cope Station
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Dry Fork Station
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
F. B. Culley power station
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Major Oak power station
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wyodak Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
John Madgett Station
CO2 emissions
2.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
North Omaha Station
CO2 emissions
2.1
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Archer Daniels Midland Decatur Power Plant
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cooper power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
River Valley power station
CO2 emissions
2.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Herbert Wagner Generating Station
CO2 emissions
1.9
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Holcomb Station
CO2 emissions
1.9
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Whelan Energy Center
CO2 emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rawhide Energy Station
CO2 emissions
1.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Archer Daniels Midland Cedar Rapids Power Plant
CO2 emissions
1.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nearman Creek power station
CO2 emissions
1.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Deerhaven Generating Station
CO2 emissions
1.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sikeston power station
CO2 emissions
1.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Muscatine Generating Station
CO2 emissions
1.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
AES Warrior Run Generation Plant
CO2 emissions
1.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sheldon Station
CO2 emissions
1.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
TS Power Plant
CO2 emissions
1.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Apache Generating Station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Dallman Station
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ray Nixon Power Plant
CO2 emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Archer Daniels Midland Clinton Power Plant
CO2 emissions
1.0
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Polk Power Station
CO2 emissions
1.0
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Taconite Harbor Energy Center
CO2 emissions
1.0
MT/y
Investment need
0.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Northampton Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Silver Bay Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Colver Green Energy power station
CO2 emissions
0.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Platte Generating Station
CO2 emissions
0.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Grant Town Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hardin Generating Station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Marion Plant
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Panther Creek Energy Facility
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Schiller Station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
St. Nicholas Cogeneration Plant
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Whitewater Valley Generating Station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wygen III power station
CO2 emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
John B. Rich Memorial Power Station
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lon Wright Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Previous
Next
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Saskatchewan
Satakunta
Sardegna
Sarawak
Saraburi
Santa Cruz
Sakhalin
San Cristóbal
Sakha
Santa Catarina
Sainyabuli
Republika Srpska
Ruse
Ryazan
Saarland
Rostov
Rome
Rio Grande do Sul
Riau
Réunion
Retalhuleu
Queensland
Rangpur
Rajasthan
Rayong
Quang Nam
Quang Ninh
Quang Binh
Qinghai
Punjab state
Pyongyang
Punjab province
Puerto Rico
Primorsky
Praha
Prachinburi
Pomorskie
Pomoravlje
Podlaskie
Plzensky
Pljevlja
Pernik
Perak
Pennsylvania
Peloponnísou
Pavlodar
Pardubický
Paraná
Papua
Paijat-Hame
Pamplemousses
Ostrobothnia
Oriental
Orhon
Orenburg
Omsk
Opolskie
Oklahoma
Olomoucky
Ohio
Ogun
Odisha
Oddar Meanchey
Novosibirsk
Novaci
Nova Scotia
Northern Mindanao
Northern Ireland
Northern Hungary
North Western
North Sumatra
North Sulawesi
North Rhine-Westphalia
North Pyongan
North Kazakhstan
North Maluku
North Jeolla
North Hamgyong
North Gyeongsang
North Dakota
Nordjylland
Norte de Santander
North Carolina
Ningxia
Noord-Brabant
New South Wales
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New Brunswick
New Caledonia
Nevada
Negeri Sembilan
Nebraska
Murmansk
Munster
Muğla
Mpumalanga
Moselle
Moravian-Silesian
Moravskoslezsky
Previous
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
