Global
United States
198.3
 GW
1005
 MT

Coal plants in

United States

Additional profit over 30 years
553.7
Bn. $
% Profitable
94
%
 
Annual CO2 emissions saved
1005
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
475.1
Bn. $

Investment Potential

21
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.

Investment breakdown

475.1
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
553.7
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
215,439
M. $
Wind
265,154
M. $
Battery
23,722
M. $

Production costs

5.2
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
3.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy

Dive deeper into the data

0
 Regions
0
 Power plants
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Indiana
CO2 emissions saved
78.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
37.9
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
West Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
63.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
34.2
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kentucky
CO2 emissions saved
57.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
29.5
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pennsylvania
CO2 emissions saved
52.7
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
26.4
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Missouri
CO2 emissions saved
51.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
47.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
23.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Texas
CO2 emissions saved
42.8
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Ohio
CO2 emissions saved
42.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Illinois
CO2 emissions saved
36.8
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.0
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wyoming
CO2 emissions saved
35.1
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
13.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Michigan
CO2 emissions saved
34.7
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
18.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tennessee
CO2 emissions saved
34.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Florida
CO2 emissions saved
32.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
16.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Georgia
CO2 emissions saved
30.7
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.2
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wisconsin
CO2 emissions saved
27.5
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
27.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.4
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arkansas
CO2 emissions saved
27.1
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
11.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Iowa
CO2 emissions saved
26.5
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kansas
CO2 emissions saved
25.4
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alabama
CO2 emissions saved
25.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.4
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Utah
CO2 emissions saved
24.4
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Colorado
CO2 emissions saved
24.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.9
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Minnesota
CO2 emissions saved
22.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
9.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Nebraska
CO2 emissions saved
20.4
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.8
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Oklahoma
CO2 emissions saved
18.5
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.5
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Louisiana
CO2 emissions saved
15.8
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arizona
CO2 emissions saved
12.4
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.9
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
75
%
Maryland
CO2 emissions saved
10.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.5
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
9.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.5
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
33
%
Montana
CO2 emissions saved
8.8
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
8.5
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.6
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
67
%
New Mexico
CO2 emissions saved
8.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.2
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Mississippi
CO2 emissions saved
5.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.4
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Nevada
CO2 emissions saved
4.6
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.3
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Washington
CO2 emissions saved
3.7
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
New Hampshire
CO2 emissions saved
3.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.7
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Puerto Rico
CO2 emissions saved
3.0
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Delaware
CO2 emissions saved
2.4
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
2.3
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.0
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alaska
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
  MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
  Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Neil Simpson Power Plants
CO2 emissions
0.5
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Scrubgrass Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
0.5
  MT/y
Investment need
0.3
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Spiritwood Industrial Park
CO2 emissions
0.5
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wygen I power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wygen II power station
CO2 emissions
0.5
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Columbus ADM power station
CO2 emissions
0.4
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kimberly-Clark Chester Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.4
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
TES Filer City Station
CO2 emissions
0.4
  MT/y
Investment need
0.2
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ebensburg Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mt. Carmel Cogeneration Facility
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Prairie Creek Generating Station
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Spring Grove power station
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sunnyside Cogeneration Facility
CO2 emissions
0.3
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Healy Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rosebud Power Plant
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Westwood Generating Station
CO2 emissions
0.2
  MT/y
Investment need
0.1
  Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Mon
Miyagi
Montana
Missouri
Minnesota
Mississippi
Michigan
Midtjylland
Miaoli
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Mazowieckie
Matabeleland North
Maranhão
Manisa
Maryland
Maluku
Małopolskie
Madhya Pradesh
Mallorca
Maharashtra
Lviv
Lubuskie
Luhansk
Lubelskie
Louisiana
Lower Saxony
Loire-Atlantique
Ljubljana
Lodzkie
Limpopo
Lang Son
Liaoning
Lampung
Kyustendil
Lampang
Lam Dong
Kyūshū
Kyiv
KwaZulu-Natal
Kujawsko-Pomorskie
Kütahya
Královéhradecký
Krasnoyarsk
Kostanay
Konya
Košice
Kosovo
Kogi
Kirov
Kocaeli
Kicevo
Khulna
Kharkiv
Khomas
Khorasan
Khanh Hoa
Khakassia
Khabarovsk
Kentucky
Kemerovo
Kayin
Karnataka
Karlovarský
Karaganda
Kaohsiung
Kantō
Kansas
Kanchanaburi
Kansai
Johor
Kahramanmaraş
Kaliningrad
Jilin
Jihomoravský
Jiangxi
Jiangsu
Jharkhand
Jambi
İzmir
Ivano-Frankivsk
Istra
Irkutsk
Iowa
Indiana
Inner Mongolia
Incheon
Illinois
Ilocos
Hunan
Iaşi
Hubei
Hunedoara
Hualien
Hong Kong
Hokkaido
Hessen
Heilongjiang
Henan
Hamburg
Hau Giang
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
Make the move.
Resources
Privacy Policy
Imprint
Switch Tool
Contact