Home
SwitchTool
About us
Insights
Resources
Global
China
Jiangsu
83.6
GW
365
MT/y
China
Jiangsu
% Profitable plants
100
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
365
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
187.9
Bn. $
Environmental impact
365
MT / y
CO2 can be saved profitably in this region until 2030 through SwitchCoal
Investment breakdown
Investment Sum
100% of this region’s power plants can be profitably converted to S-W-B with a $187.9 Bn total investment.
Solar
80,738
M. $
Wind
98,985
M. $
Battery
8,175
M. $
Dive deeper into the data
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Ligang power station
CO2 Emissions
18.4
MT/y
Investment need
9.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Taizhou power station
CO2 Emissions
16.0
MT/y
Investment need
8.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jurong power station
CO2 Emissions
15.4
MT/y
Investment need
8.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xuzhou Pengcheng power station
CO2 Emissions
15.0
MT/y
Investment need
8.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Changshu-1 power station
CO2 Emissions
14.8
MT/y
Investment need
7.6
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Changzhou power station
CO2 Emissions
13.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Sheyanggang power station
CO2 Emissions
13.2
MT/y
Investment need
6.0
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zhangjiagang Shazhou power station
CO2 Emissions
13.2
MT/y
Investment need
6.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jianbi power station
CO2 Emissions
11.7
MT/y
Investment need
6.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Nantong power station
CO2 Emissions
11.6
MT/y
Investment need
5.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xinhai power station
CO2 Emissions
11.6
MT/y
Investment need
5.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Guoxin Yangzhou power station
CO2 Emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
6.0
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Lusigang power station
CO2 Emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
6.0
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Huaneng Taicang power station
CO2 Emissions
8.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Guohua Xuzhou power station
CO2 Emissions
8.6
MT/y
Investment need
4.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jinling power station
CO2 Emissions
8.6
MT/y
Investment need
4.6
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Changshu-2 power station
CO2 Emissions
8.4
MT/y
Investment need
4.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yancheng Binhai power station
CO2 Emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Guoxin Binhai Port power station
CO2 Emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Guoxin Shazhou power station
CO2 Emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Zhenjiang power station
CO2 Emissions
6.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Huaneng Huaiyin power station
CO2 Emissions
6.4
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangyin Sulong power station
CO2 Emissions
6.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Taicanggang power station
CO2 Emissions
6.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xutang power station
CO2 Emissions
6.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Chenjiagang power station
CO2 Emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Datang Nanjing Xiaguan-3 power station
CO2 Emissions
5.6
MT/y
Investment need
3.0
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wangting power station
CO2 Emissions
5.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Guohua Taicang power station
CO2 Emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Nanre Thermal power station
CO2 Emissions
5.2
MT/y
Investment need
2.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Suqian power station
CO2 Emissions
5.2
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kanshan power station
CO2 Emissions
5.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yancheng Binhai Port power station
CO2 Emissions
5.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
3.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Huaiyin power station
CO2 Emissions
3.3
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Datun Mine power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanjing Huarun Thermal power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanjing power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.5
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tianshenggan power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xuzhou Huaxin power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.6
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yangzhou-1 power station
CO2 Emissions
3.2
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xuzhou Huamei power station
CO2 Emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Xuzhou Mine power station
CO2 Emissions
3.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hongyang Lianyungang power station
CO2 Emissions
2.1
MT/y
Investment need
1.0
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiulong Paper Mill Jiulong power station
CO2 Emissions
1.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
APP Zhenjiang Jindong Mill power station
CO2 Emissions
1.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiulong Paper Mill Hailong power station
CO2 Emissions
1.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zhongneng Polysilicon power station
CO2 Emissions
1.5
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jingling Sinopec power station
CO2 Emissions
1.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.7
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yixing Xielian power station
CO2 Emissions
1.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.8
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sinopec Yangzi power station
CO2 Emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zhangjiagang Shagang power station
CO2 Emissions
1.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.6
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
APP Jinhuasheng Mill power station
CO2 Emissions
1.0
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Leeman Paper power station
CO2 Emissions
0.8
MT/y
Investment need
0.4
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Singpu Chemicals Taixing power station
CO2 Emissions
0.7
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Changzhou Yatai cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanjing Meishan power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanya Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Shilian Chemical Industry Captive Power Station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Suzhou Susheng Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
UPM Changshu power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yangzhou Mill power station
CO2 Emissions
0.6
MT/y
Investment need
0.3
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Fuqiang New Material power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu Jingshen Salt power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangsu OJI Paper Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nanjing Chemical Industrial Park power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Zhangjiagang Changyuan Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yangzhou Chemical Industrial Park power station
CO2 Emissions
0.4
MT/y
Investment need
0.2
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jiangyin Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Suzhou Chang Chun Chemical Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Suzhou Dongwu Cogen power station
CO2 Emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Yixing Linggu Chemical power station
CO2 Emissions
0.3
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Wuxi Rongcheng Paper Mill power station
CO2 Emissions
0.2
MT/y
Investment need
0.1
Bn $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Czech Republic
Croatia
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Saskatchewan
Satakunta
Sardegna
Sarawak
Saraburi
Santa Cruz
Sakhalin
San Cristóbal
Sakha
Santa Catarina
Sainyabuli
Republika Srpska
Ruse
Ryazan
Saarland
Rostov
Rome
Rio Grande do Sul
Riau
Réunion
Retalhuleu
Queensland
Rangpur
Rajasthan
Rayong
Quang Nam
Quang Ninh
Quang Binh
Qinghai
Punjab state
Pyongyang
Punjab province
Puerto Rico
Primorsky
Praha
Prachinburi
Pomorskie
Pomoravlje
Podlaskie
Plzensky
Pljevlja
Pernik
Perak
Pennsylvania
Peloponnísou
Pavlodar
Pardubický
Paraná
Papua
Paijat-Hame
Pamplemousses
Ostrobothnia
Oriental
Orhon
Orenburg
Omsk
Opolskie
Oklahoma
Olomoucky
Ohio
Ogun
Odisha
Oddar Meanchey
Novosibirsk
Novaci
Nova Scotia
Northern Mindanao
Northern Ireland
Northern Hungary
North Western
North Sumatra
North Sulawesi
North Rhine-Westphalia
North Pyongan
North Kazakhstan
North Maluku
North Jeolla
North Hamgyong
North Gyeongsang
North Dakota
Nordjylland
Norte de Santander
North Carolina
Ningxia
Noord-Brabant
New South Wales
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New Brunswick
New Caledonia
Nevada
Negeri Sembilan
Nebraska
Murmansk
Munster
Muğla
Mpumalanga
Moselle
Moravian-Silesian
Moravskoslezsky
Previous
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
